News Update on Tomato Genotypes Research: July – 2019

Variation in resistance to the root‐knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita in tomato genotypes bearing the Mi gene

Root‐knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) ar among the most pathogens of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) worldwide. Plant resistance is presently the tactic of selection for dominant these pests and every one the commercially obtainable resistant cultivars carry the dominant Mi factor, that confers resistance to the 3 main species Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica. but the emergence of virulent biotypes able to overcome the tomato resistance factor could represent a severe limitation to such a sway strategy. To date, very little was noted of the attainable influence of the homozygous vs heterozygous allelomorphic state of the Mi locus, or the tomato genetic background, on the expression of the resistance. so as to check each these factors, the resistance was evaluated of an oversized panel of L. esculentum genotypes (selected from the Vilmorin germplasm stock collection) to seven M. incognita lines avirulent or virulent against the Mi factor. Plant resistance was calculable by reckoning the egg plenty on the foundation systems once immunization with second‐stage juveniles (J2). copy of the nematodes was similar or, more often, considerably higher on heterozygous tomato genotypes than on homozygous ones, suggesting a attainable dose result of the Mi factor. information additionally indicated that the tomato genetic background had a significant result on the variations determined in roundworm copy, particularly once tomato genotypes were heterozygous for the Mi factor. These results have vital consequences in terms of breeding ways and sturdiness of the resistance presented by the Mi factor. [1]

In Vitro screening of tomato genotypes for drought resistance using polyethylene glycol

Drought may be a major abiotic issue that limits plant growth and productivity. Tomato is a crucial vegetable crop and space below production is restricted by irrigation water deficiency. Effort was created to

screen tomato germplasm below in vitro condition exploitation polythene glycol (PEG) at four concentrations (0, 20, forty and sixty g/l) with 2 replications in factorial CRD. necessary seed plant characters like root length and weight; shoot length and weight were recorded. Drought resistant mutant by-products and hybrid created exploitation mutant derivative as mother performed considerably superior for root characters. Decrease in seed plant growth was value notice with increasing concentration of PEG indicating precise nature of the in vitro screening. Mutant hybrid and its derivatives were ascertained with outstanding ability to continue root growth below in vitro stress

conditions indicating there ability to fight with sever water stress state of affairs. These results were additional confirmed for early indication traits in raised bed seedlings and fully-grown mature plants below field

conditions. in any respect 3 experimental conditions, mutant derivatives and hybrids performed higher than cultivated genotypes below all levels of water stress. supported results, Hy-3 and MTG 1-4 were found

to be drought resistant because of there outstanding performance in any respect levels of water stress. This in vitro screening technique is potential and price effective method to screen giant set of germplasm at intervals terribly

less period and accurately. [2]

Effects of Priming and Endosperm Integrity on Seed Germination Rates of Tomato Genotypes: II. GERMINATION AT REDUCED WATER POTENTIAL

Seed germination rates (GR =inverse of your time to germination) ar sensitive to genetic, environmental, and physiological factors. we’ve got compared the GR of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) seeds of tracheophyte T5 to those of apace germinating L. esculentum genotypes PI 341988 and PI 120256 over a variety of water potential (ψ). The influence of seed priming treatments and removal of the endosperm/testa cap envelopment the body structure tip on germination at reduced ψ were conjointly assessed. Germination time-courses at completely different ψ’s were analysed consistent with a model that known a base, or minimum, ψ permitting germination of a selected share (g) of the seed population (ψb(g)), and a ‘hydrotime constant’ (θH) indicating the speed of progress toward germination per MPa.h. The distribution of ψb(g) determined by probit analysis was characterised by a mean base ψ (b) and therefore the variance in ψb among seeds (σψb). The 3 derived parameters, b, σψb) and θH, were adequate to predict the time-courses of germination of intact seeds at any ψ. A normalized time-scale for examination germination responses to reduced ψ is introduced. The time to germination at any ψ(tg(ψ)) is normalized to be similar to that ascertained in water (tg(0)) consistent with the equation tg(0)=[l−(ψ/ψb(g))]tg(ψ). PI 341988 seeds were a lot of tolerant of reduced ψ and had a a lot of fast GR than T5 seeds thanks to each a lower b and a smaller θH. The fast germination of PI 120256, on the opposite hand, may be attributed entirely to a smaller θH. Seed priming (6 d in −1.2 MPa synthetic resin glycol 8000 resolution at two0 °C followed by drying) enlarged GR the least bit ψ>ψb(g), however failed to lower the minimum ψ permitting germination; i.e. priming reduced θH while not lowering ψb. Removing the endosperm/testa cap (cut seeds) markedly enlarged GR and lowered  the mean ψ needed to inhibit germination by zero.7 to 0.9 MPa. However, this resulted primarily from downward adjustment in b throughout the incubation of cut seeds at low ψ within the take a look at solutions. The distinction in b between intact and cut seeds incubated at high ψ was abundant less (0.l MPa), indicating that at the time of body structure protrusion, the reproductive structure had weakened to the purpose wherever it recognized solely alittle mechanical barrier. within the intact seed, reproductive structure weakening and therefore the downward adjustment in embryo b ceased at ψ < −0.6 MPa, whereas the reduction in θH related to priming proceeded all the way down to a minimum of −1.2 MPa. supported these information and on the pressure needed to push the embryos from the seeds at varied times when imbibition, it seems that the first result of priming was to shorten the time needed for final reproductive structure weakening to occur. However, as priming enlarged GR even in cut seeds, priming effects on the embryo could management the speed of reproductive structure weakening. [3]

Differential response of tomato genotypes to Xanthomonas-specific pathogen-associated molecular patterns and correlation with bacterial spot (Xanthomonas perforans) resistance

Plants rely upon innate immune responses to retard the initial unfold of pathogens coming into through stomata, hydathodes or injuries. These responses are triggered by preserved patterns in pathogen-encoded molecules referred to as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Production of reactive chemical element species (ROS) is one in all the primary responses, and also the ensuing ‘oxidative burst’ is taken into account to be a primary line of defense. during this study, we tend to conducted association analyses between ROS production and microorganism spot (BS; genus Xanthomonas spp.) resistance in sixty three genotypes of tomato (Solanum genus Lycopersicon L.). A luminol-based assay was performed on leaf tissues that had been treated with a flagellin twenty two (flg22), flagellin twenty eight and a Xanthomonas-specific flg22 (flg22-Xac) amide, to live PAMP-induced ROS production in every genotype. These genotypes were conjointly assessed for bachelor’s degree malady response by immunisation with genus Xanthomonas perforans, race T4. though there was no consistent relationship between peptides used and host response to the bachelor’s degree, there was a big correlational statistics… [4]

Botany and Breeding of Tomato to Obtain Genotypes Resistant to Bacterial Wilt

Bacterial wilt may be a unwellness that’s of world importance as a result of it’s tough to regulate and infrequently compromises the entire crop. the utilization of resistant varieties is that the main type of management of this unwellness. the target of this work was to hold out a literature review with the most factors associated with the phytology and breeding of tomato to get genotypes immune to microorganism wilt. it had been found completely different data associated with the genetic management of tomato resistance in respect to the amount of genes and their interaction because of the high genetic diversity at intervals the Ralstonia solanacearum species advanced, that is that the reason behind microorganism wilt. The high host-pathogen interaction reflects on completely different breeding methods reckoning on the surroundings and also the supply of resistance used. [5]


[1] Jacquet, M., Bongiovanni, M., Martinez, M., Verschave, P., Wajnberg, E. and Castagnone‐Sereno, P., 2005. Variation in resistance to the root‐knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita in tomato genotypes bearing the Mi gene. Plant Pathology, 54(2), pp.93-99. (Web Link)

[2] Manoj, K. and Uday, D., 2007. In vitro screening of tomato genotypes for drought resistance using polyethylene glycol. African Journal of Biotechnology, 6(6). (Web Link)

[3] DAHAL, P. and BRADFORD, K.J., 1990. Effects of priming and endosperm integrity on seed germination rates of tomato genotypes: II. Germination at reduced water potential. Journal of Experimental Botany, 41(11), pp.1441-1453. (Web Link)

[4] Differential response of tomato genotypes to Xanthomonas-specific pathogen-associated molecular patterns and correlation with bacterial spot (Xanthomonas perforans) resistance

Krishna Bhattarai, Frank J Louws, John D Williamson & Dilip R Panthee

Horticulture Research volume 3, Article number: 16035 (2016) (Web Link)

[5] Silva Costa, K. D., Silva, J., Santos, A. M., Filho, J. L., Santos, P. R. and Oliveira Silva, M. (2017) “Botany and Breeding of Tomato to Obtain Genotypes Resistant to Bacterial Wilt”, Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 19(2), pp. 1-11. doi: 10.9734/JEAI/2017/38489. (Web Link)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *